Design a scalable, extensible file storage service that abstracts multiple storage backends (HDFS, NFS) through a unified interface, providing seamless file operations for distributed applications.
Key Design Principles
Pluggability: SPI-based driver architecture for easy backend integration
Scalability: Handle millions of files with horizontal scaling
Reliability: 99.9% availability with fault tolerance
Performance: Sub-second response times for file operations
Security: Enterprise-grade access control and encryption
High-Level Architecture
graph TB
Client[Client Applications] --> SDK[FileSystem SDK]
SDK --> LB[Load Balancer]
LB --> API[File Storage API Gateway]
API --> Service[FileStorageService]
Service --> SPI[SPI Framework]
SPI --> HDFS[HDFS Driver]
SPI --> NFS[NFS Driver]
SPI --> S3[S3 Driver]
HDFS --> HDFSCluster[HDFS Cluster]
NFS --> NFSServer[NFS Server]
S3 --> S3Bucket[S3 Storage]
Service --> Cache[Redis Cache]
Service --> DB[Metadata DB]
Service --> MQ[Message Queue]
💡 Interview Insight: When discussing system architecture, emphasize the separation of concerns - API layer handles routing and validation, service layer manages business logic, and SPI layer provides storage abstraction. This demonstrates understanding of layered architecture patterns.
Strategy Pattern: SPI drivers implement different storage strategies
Factory Pattern: Driver creation based on configuration
Template Method: Common file operations with backend-specific implementations
Circuit Breaker: Fault tolerance for external storage systems
Observer Pattern: Event-driven notifications for file operations
💡 Interview Insight: Discussing design patterns shows architectural maturity. Mention how the Strategy pattern enables runtime switching between storage backends without code changes, which is crucial for multi-cloud deployments.
Core Components
1. FileStorageService
The central orchestrator managing all file operations:
💡 Interview Insight: Metadata design is crucial for system scalability. Discuss partitioning strategies - file_id can be hash-partitioned, and time-based partitioning for access logs enables efficient historical data management.
💡 Interview Insight: SPI demonstrates understanding of extensibility patterns. Mention that this approach allows adding new storage backends without modifying core service code, following the Open-Closed Principle.
flowchart TD
A[Client Request] --> B{Request Validation}
B -->|Valid| C[Authentication & Authorization]
B -->|Invalid| D[Return 400 Bad Request]
C -->|Authorized| E[Route to Service]
C -->|Unauthorized| F[Return 401/403]
E --> G[Business Logic Processing]
G --> H{Storage Operation}
H -->|Success| I[Update Metadata]
H -->|Failure| J[Rollback & Error Response]
I --> K[Generate Response]
K --> L[Return Success Response]
J --> M[Return Error Response]
💡 Interview Insight: API design considerations include idempotency for upload operations, proper HTTP status codes, and consistent error response format. Discuss rate limiting and API versioning strategies for production systems.
💡 Interview Insight: SDK design demonstrates client-side engineering skills. Discuss thread safety, connection pooling, and how to handle large file uploads with chunking and resume capabilities.
flowchart TD
A[File Upload Request] --> B{File Size Check}
B -->|< 100MB| C{Performance Priority?}
B -->|> 100MB| D{Durability Priority?}
C -->|Yes| E[NFS - Low Latency]
C -->|No| F[HDFS - Cost Effective]
D -->|Yes| G[HDFS - Replication]
D -->|No| H[S3 - Archival]
E --> I[Store in NFS]
F --> J[Store in HDFS]
G --> J
H --> K[Store in S3]
💡 Interview Insight: Storage selection demonstrates understanding of trade-offs. NFS offers low latency but limited scalability, HDFS provides distributed storage with replication, S3 offers infinite scale but higher latency. Discuss when to use each based on access patterns.
💡 Interview Insight: Performance discussions should cover caching strategies (what to cache, cache invalidation), connection pooling, and async processing. Mention specific metrics like P99 latency targets and throughput requirements.
graph LR
subgraph "Application Metrics"
A[Upload Rate]
B[Download Rate]
C[Error Rate]
D[Response Time]
end
subgraph "Infrastructure Metrics"
E[CPU Usage]
F[Memory Usage]
G[Disk I/O]
H[Network I/O]
end
subgraph "Business Metrics"
I[Storage Usage]
J[Active Users]
K[File Types]
L[Storage Costs]
end
A --> M[Grafana Dashboard]
B --> M
C --> M
D --> M
E --> M
F --> M
G --> M
H --> M
I --> M
J --> M
K --> M
L --> M
💡 Interview Insight: Observability is crucial for production systems. Discuss the difference between metrics (quantitative), logs (qualitative), and traces (request flow). Mention SLA/SLO concepts and how monitoring supports them.
graph TD
A[Load Balancer] --> B[File Service Instance 1]
A --> C[File Service Instance 2]
A --> D[File Service Instance N]
B --> E[Storage Backend Pool]
C --> E
D --> E
E --> F[HDFS Cluster]
E --> G[NFS Servers]
E --> H[S3 Storage]
I[Auto Scaler] --> A
I --> B
I --> C
I --> D
💡 Interview Insight: Deployment discussions should cover horizontal vs vertical scaling, stateless service design, and data partitioning strategies. Mention circuit breakers for external dependencies and graceful degradation patterns.
Interview Key Points Summary
System Design Fundamentals
Scalability: Horizontal scaling through stateless services
Reliability: Circuit breakers, retries, and failover mechanisms
Consistency: Eventual consistency for metadata with strong consistency for file operations
Availability: Multi-region deployment with data replication
Technical Deep Dives
SPI Pattern: Demonstrates extensibility and loose coupling
Caching Strategy: Multi-level caching with proper invalidation
Security: Authentication, authorization, and file validation
Monitoring: Metrics, logging, and distributed tracing
Trade-offs and Decisions
Storage Selection: Performance vs cost vs durability
Consistency Models: CAP theorem considerations
API Design: REST vs GraphQL vs gRPC
Technology Choices: Java ecosystem vs alternatives
Production Readiness
Operations: Deployment, monitoring, and incident response
Performance: Benchmarking and optimization strategies
Security: Threat modeling and security testing
Compliance: Data protection and regulatory requirements
This comprehensive design demonstrates understanding of distributed systems, software architecture patterns, and production engineering practices essential for senior engineering roles.